Geekologie I Watch Stuff The Superficial Hedonistica

Boning In The Ocean: $290,000/Night Luxury Submarine

luxury-submarine-rental-1.jpg

This is the Lover's Deep, a luxury submarine that rich people can rent to have sex in under the sea. It costs $145,000/night per person though and there's a two-night minimum, so unless you're planning on bringing a love doll for the least romantic getaway of all time, the minimum stay with another human being will set you back $580,000. I suggest going Dutch. The luxury sub comes with giant exterior-illuminated windows so you can watch all the fish and shipwrecks go by while you're boning. Just don't let your lover catch you eying the mermaids too hard mid-coitus, or you might have a problem. And do not, under any circumstances, call her Ariel. Just trust me on that one (I had a girlfriend break up with me for asking her to cinch her legs up in a trashbag and flop around in the bathtub).

Keep going for several more shots of the most magical two nights of your life.

luxury-submarine-rental-2.jpg

luxury-submarine-rental-3.jpg

luxury-submarine-rental-4.jpg

Thanks to Dave, who claims he's had sex in Dr. No's underwater base from James Bond, and I have no reason not to believe him.

There are Comments.
  • lorrrd

    didnt see the geek-critical relevance nor enuff esthetics but "Ariel" made it relevant (not 4 me tho...)

  • I find submarines fascinating.
    This doesn't look like a sub inside though - it's boring.

  • Frédéric Purenne

    My first thought was that at $290,000 per night, you could buy the darned thing within a year! I took a couple of billion, divided by 365 and realized I was poor...

  • Imadethisnameup

    What a hole in the water.

  • Vladeon

    "And do not, under any circumstances, call her Ariel."

    Now all the Disney Princess posts make so much more sense. I suppose it's not the weirdest fetish out there.

  • Guest

    Picture the two of us alone inside my golden submarine

  • Mark Behuncik

    Kickin' it Cap'n Nemo style!

  • Karen A. Adams

    my buddy's step-aunt Μ­­­­­­а­­­­­­κ­­­­­­℮­­­­­­ѕ $­­­­­­­­­63/hr on the і­­­­­­ո­­­­­­τ­­­­­­℮­­­­­­r­­­­­­ո­­­­­­℮­­­­­­τ. She has been laid off for 5 Μ­­­­­­օ­­­­­­ո­­­­­­τ­­­­­­հ­­­­­­ѕ but last month her р­­­­­­а­­­­­­Уcheck was $­­­­­­­­­19544 just W­­­­­­օ­­­­­­r­­­­­­κ­­­­i­­­­­­­­ng on the і­­­­­­ո­­­­­­τ­­­­­­℮­­­­­­r­­­­­­ո­­­­­­℮­­­­­­τ for a Ϝ­­­­­­℮­­­­­­W հ­­­­­­օ­­­­­­υ­­­­­­rs. հ­­­­­­℮­­­­­­r­­­­­­℮'s the ѕ­­­­­­і­­­­­­τ­­­­­­℮ to read more,... http://Googleprofitfalls2014to...

    ▋▋▋ ▋▋▋ ▋▋▋ ▋⃥▋▋ ▋▋ᤶ▋ ▋▋▋Now all the Disney Princess posts make so much more sense. I suppose it's not the weirdest fetish out there.

  • lorrrd

    rip-off !!! ... but milk those billionaires as long they not burn yet !

    another day another decadent cardinal-sin

    OH pope ! Send Moby Dick down there 2 swallow the whole heck ! {ooops rear}

    (or bow)

    (yeah sounded gay -- do moby still has a wiener or ? the nutz were lost in the shuffle)

    + all pics lookin` faked , shopped or worse ! (??)

  • What is the "worse" thing you can do to a picture beyond it being "faked, shopped"? Conjured from black magic? I'm interested.

  • lorrrd

    i gave that two Q-marks ! And first ! But you can name it !
    ok ok s-th reasonable : staging & manipulating masses (like a marathon-rapture) Resumé : real pictures complete outta context with misleading captions ( jus` like daily media... )

  • A marathon-rapture eh? Tell me more.

  • lorrrd

    <<< opposite of a big Alex-Jones-fan but i gotta agree : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
    (tells you more)

  • Uhg... I'm sorry I asked.

blog comments powered by Disqus