Geekologie I Watch Stuff The Superficial Hedonistica

Boning In The Ocean: $290,000/Night Luxury Submarine


This is the Lover's Deep, a luxury submarine that rich people can rent to have sex in under the sea. It costs $145,000/night per person though and there's a two-night minimum, so unless you're planning on bringing a love doll for the least romantic getaway of all time, the minimum stay with another human being will set you back $580,000. I suggest going Dutch. The luxury sub comes with giant exterior-illuminated windows so you can watch all the fish and shipwrecks go by while you're boning. Just don't let your lover catch you eying the mermaids too hard mid-coitus, or you might have a problem. And do not, under any circumstances, call her Ariel. Just trust me on that one (I had a girlfriend break up with me for asking her to cinch her legs up in a trashbag and flop around in the bathtub).

Keep going for several more shots of the most magical two nights of your life.




Thanks to Dave, who claims he's had sex in Dr. No's underwater base from James Bond, and I have no reason not to believe him.

There are Comments.
  • lorrrd

    didnt see the geek-critical relevance nor enuff esthetics but "Ariel" made it relevant (not 4 me tho...)

  • I find submarines fascinating.
    This doesn't look like a sub inside though - it's boring.

  • Frédéric Purenne

    My first thought was that at $290,000 per night, you could buy the darned thing within a year! I took a couple of billion, divided by 365 and realized I was poor...

  • Imadethisnameup

    What a hole in the water.

  • Vladeon

    "And do not, under any circumstances, call her Ariel."

    Now all the Disney Princess posts make so much more sense. I suppose it's not the weirdest fetish out there.

  • Guest

    Picture the two of us alone inside my golden submarine

  • Mark Behuncik

    Kickin' it Cap'n Nemo style!

  • Karen A. Adams

    my buddy's step-aunt Μ­­­­­­а­­­­­­κ­­­­­­℮­­­­­­ѕ $­­­­­­­­­63/hr on the і­­­­­­ո­­­­­­τ­­­­­­℮­­­­­­r­­­­­­ո­­­­­­℮­­­­­­τ. She has been laid off for 5 Μ­­­­­­օ­­­­­­ո­­­­­­τ­­­­­­հ­­­­­­ѕ but last month her р­­­­­­а­­­­­­Уcheck was $­­­­­­­­­19544 just W­­­­­­օ­­­­­­r­­­­­­κ­­­­i­­­­­­­­ng on the і­­­­­­ո­­­­­­τ­­­­­­℮­­­­­­r­­­­­­ո­­­­­­℮­­­­­­τ for a Ϝ­­­­­­℮­­­­­­W հ­­­­­­օ­­­­­­υ­­­­­­rs. հ­­­­­­℮­­­­­­r­­­­­­℮'s the ѕ­­­­­­і­­­­­­τ­­­­­­℮ to read more,... http://Googleprofitfalls2014to...

    ▋▋▋ ▋▋▋ ▋▋▋ ▋⃥▋▋ ▋▋ᤶ▋ ▋▋▋Now all the Disney Princess posts make so much more sense. I suppose it's not the weirdest fetish out there.

  • lorrrd

    rip-off !!! ... but milk those billionaires as long they not burn yet !

    another day another decadent cardinal-sin

    OH pope ! Send Moby Dick down there 2 swallow the whole heck ! {ooops rear}

    (or bow)

    (yeah sounded gay -- do moby still has a wiener or ? the nutz were lost in the shuffle)

    + all pics lookin` faked , shopped or worse ! (??)

  • What is the "worse" thing you can do to a picture beyond it being "faked, shopped"? Conjured from black magic? I'm interested.

  • lorrrd

    i gave that two Q-marks ! And first ! But you can name it !
    ok ok s-th reasonable : staging & manipulating masses (like a marathon-rapture) Resumé : real pictures complete outta context with misleading captions ( jus` like daily media... )

  • A marathon-rapture eh? Tell me more.

  • lorrrd

    <<< opposite of a big Alex-Jones-fan but i gotta agree :
    (tells you more)

  • Uhg... I'm sorry I asked.

blog comments powered by Disqus